NOTE: For more complete information please take the time to see: http://intensegrid.com/assemblypost/Foundations_of_Freedom_20110124.pdf
The Year 1871
The United States Isn't a Country
It's a Corporation!
by Lisa Guliani
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776 Fourth of July 2002 has come and gone, and Americans honored the holiday with a renewed patriotic fervor that reminded me of the Bicentennial celebrations of 1976. As is customary, traditional fireworks displays took center stage and scores of people turned out to witness the dazzling show in the summer sky. With mixed feelings, I sat with friends on a crowded Pennsylvania sidewalk beneath a glittering, mesmerizing explosion of color, pondering the keen sense of sadness and betrayal that overwhelmed my spirit. Looking around at the huge crowds gathered for the annual events, I thought silently, "We are not free." In truth, we have not been a free people for a very long time.
We celebrate this day in honor of our "independence". We call ourselves a free people in a land of liberty. Our anthems proudly sing the praises of this nation, and we raise our voices, wave our flags and join in song — but how many Americans realize they are not free? This is a myth perpetuated by the powers-that-be in order to avoid any major civil unrest, and to keep us all living under the thumb of a militaristic corporate Big Brother within the illusions that have been created for us. The truth of the matter is this: what freedom has not been stolen from us, we have surrendered willingly through our silence and ignorance. As Americans, most of us have no idea how our freedoms are maintained — or lost. Apparently, our ancestors didn't have a good grasp of this either. It is sad, but it is also very true. Don't point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth — what lies beyond the myths. Your so-called government is not going to tell you, either.
To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War.
We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is "America" — only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a "free" people or not.
So, let's roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn't teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you'll stay awake for this lesson.
The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.
What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.
The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well.
The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title.
The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner: "The Constitution for the United States of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation.
The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America.
Think about that for a moment.
Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.
So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.
According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.
In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" — that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays?
I don't.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia — encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does. You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses — not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told.
How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else's massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we going to keep going along with this?? When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a "de facto," or unlawful, form of government — the corporate body of the death-mongers — The Controllers.
With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.
The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the ConstitutionalRepublic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES.
They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the ConstitutionalRepublic.
I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the
Corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution.
How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!
Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.
The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate "departments." And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law.
The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, "Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?" Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance. Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you — at a price.
Be wary of accepting so-called "benefits" of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren't you enslaved enough already?
I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don't in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.
The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers.
This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death.
The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they've got you by the pockets. Actually, they've had you by the ass for as long as you've been alive. In your heart, you know it's true. Don't believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how "free" you really are. With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.
Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster — and restore our ConstitutionalRepublic. In an upcoming article, we'll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became "property" of the corporation and enslaved by our silence. I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true — not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution.
What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.
Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all — pray — that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot — come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves we are free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic?
Something to think about — it's called freedom.
It's a Corporation!
by Lisa Guliani
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776 Fourth of July 2002 has come and gone, and Americans honored the holiday with a renewed patriotic fervor that reminded me of the Bicentennial celebrations of 1976. As is customary, traditional fireworks displays took center stage and scores of people turned out to witness the dazzling show in the summer sky. With mixed feelings, I sat with friends on a crowded Pennsylvania sidewalk beneath a glittering, mesmerizing explosion of color, pondering the keen sense of sadness and betrayal that overwhelmed my spirit. Looking around at the huge crowds gathered for the annual events, I thought silently, "We are not free." In truth, we have not been a free people for a very long time.
We celebrate this day in honor of our "independence". We call ourselves a free people in a land of liberty. Our anthems proudly sing the praises of this nation, and we raise our voices, wave our flags and join in song — but how many Americans realize they are not free? This is a myth perpetuated by the powers-that-be in order to avoid any major civil unrest, and to keep us all living under the thumb of a militaristic corporate Big Brother within the illusions that have been created for us. The truth of the matter is this: what freedom has not been stolen from us, we have surrendered willingly through our silence and ignorance. As Americans, most of us have no idea how our freedoms are maintained — or lost. Apparently, our ancestors didn't have a good grasp of this either. It is sad, but it is also very true. Don't point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth — what lies beyond the myths. Your so-called government is not going to tell you, either.
To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War.
We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is "America" — only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a "free" people or not.
So, let's roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn't teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you'll stay awake for this lesson.
The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.
What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.
The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well.
The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title.
The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner: "The Constitution for the United States of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation.
The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America.
Think about that for a moment.
Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.
So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.
According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.
In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" — that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays?
I don't.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia — encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does. You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses — not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told.
How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else's massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we going to keep going along with this?? When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a "de facto," or unlawful, form of government — the corporate body of the death-mongers — The Controllers.
With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.
The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the ConstitutionalRepublic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES.
They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the ConstitutionalRepublic.
I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the
Corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution.
How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!
Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.
The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate "departments." And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law.
The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, "Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?" Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance. Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you — at a price.
Be wary of accepting so-called "benefits" of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren't you enslaved enough already?
I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don't in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.
The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers.
This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death.
The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they've got you by the pockets. Actually, they've had you by the ass for as long as you've been alive. In your heart, you know it's true. Don't believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how "free" you really are. With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.
Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster — and restore our ConstitutionalRepublic. In an upcoming article, we'll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became "property" of the corporation and enslaved by our silence. I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true — not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution.
What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.
Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all — pray — that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot — come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves we are free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic?
Something to think about — it's called freedom.
And much, much more !
Source: http://proliberty.com/observer/20010402.htm
From the April 2001 Idaho Observer:
Is our Constitutional House on Fire?
The imprisonment of Oroville, Wash., pro-American microbroadcaster Mark Alan has sold a lot of newspapers in the remote and sparsely populated high country near the Canadian border. A majority of people in the distribution range of The Okanogan Valley Gazette Tribune are angry that the federal government would keep one of their own in jail on bogus assault charges. The tragedy softened the editorial heart of the Tribune into accepting a few articles intended to open a few eyes to some historic truths that explain what is happening to our country. Following is one such article. Thanks, Bob. You have managed to explain a complex concept in terms we can all understand well enough to finally see how we have been had.
by Bob Nicholson
The "Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," Section 34 of the Forty-First Congress of the United States, Session III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 1871, states that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia and to whatever properties are legally titled to the UNITED STATES, by its registration in the corporate County, State, and Federal governments that are under military power of the UNITED STATES and its creditors. Under this provision, the military Congress of the UNITED STATES has the power to pass private international law for application within the federal District of Columbia.
The Act provides that the UNITED STATES, the corporation, has jurisdiction only within the confines of the ten-mile-square parcel of land, known as the District of Columbia, and its legal property; and that the corporation Congress has power to pass Private International Law, applicable only in the District of Columbia.
The Act specifically defines the jurisdiction and the venue of the corporation.
UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation.
What was not said in 1871, but was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(3): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation.
Title 28, UNITED STATES CODE, is Copyrighted Private International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety, is Copyrighted Private International Law, and applicable only in the District of Columbia.
The previous information was taken almost verbatim from the beginning of a letter sent to King County Sheriff David Reichert of Seattle from Gary W. Phillips. Phillips, 69, whose career with the Immigration and Naturalization Service began in 1956 and resulted in his being the federal agency's director at Sea Tac Airport for 20 years, began challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Observer, March, 2000). After nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to flee his country to protect his life after exposing the facts of the illegality of the federal government's criminal income tax collection scam -- facts that are becoming well know among informed people throughout the country.
Why did the Congress feel the need to separate the District of Columbia with a special Act of Congress? What kind of a government did it create? The Congress created a corporation. Where did the Congress find the authority in the Constitution to reconstitute any part of the United States as a corporation? Quite simply, in 1791 the Constitution was set aside to make room for the corporation. Would this Act benefit the Republic? In truth, it would be of no benefit. The corporate bottom line is profit. The municipal bottom line is service. To replace our service-oriented form of government with a profit-oriented form of government without our knowledge or consent can only be described as treason.
The process began in the mid 1860s after the Civil War -- a war that depleted the country financially. Once the smoke settled European international bankers arrived in town. The international bankers and the Congress conjured up this bit of mischief and passed it into law.
But whose law? This Congress broke faith with the People in 1871 and sold us out when they formed this corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia.
A few superficial changes were made to the original Constitution and it was no longer the real thing. Congress did not change the name of the document, so they could claim to be reading from the Constitution. They merely changed it from the Constitution for the United States of America to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They changed the "for" to "of' and capitalized all the letters. All of the sudden we had two Constitutions.
The Act of 1871 provided a government for the District of Columbia and created a corporation entitled the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whose jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities created by the municipal corporation and operative only in the District of Columbia. Washington, District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed within the District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia and it's possessions.
The States of the Republic are not possessions of the District of Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam are possessions of the District of Columbia as well as property legally titled to the UNITED STATES by states and counties.
The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was put together in the District of Columbia as Copyrighted Private International Law and is applicable only in the District of Columbia. By their own rules of jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS have no business prosecuting anyone outside of the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT has no venue outside of the District of Columbia and, therefore, has no jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia and its possessions. The Congress cannot pass a law that is applicable in the several States of the Republic.
If all the laws passed in the District of Columbia are Private International Law, this includes all of the UNITED STATES CODE and the statutes at large passed after 1871, and are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then why have they become the law of the land?
Essentially, this unholy alliance, from its treacherous inception in an international banker-influenced post-Civil War era, built an illegal corporation that has systematically corrupted every state, county and city in this nation and corrupted the thinking of most people of the United States of America.
This illegal corporation has created dozens of agencies, the IRS, FBI, DEA, and the BATF, to name a few, which employ thousands of agents who receive excellent salaries and benefits for betraying their friends and families while enforcing the malefic edicts of the so-called Congress.
The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then release their ill-begotten creatures to destroy those who do not fully conform to their wishes, and strike fear into hearts of those who do.
Kidnapping and conspiracy are involved in every arrest and conviction by federal authorities outside of the District of Columbia.
The question now leads to whether our duly elected public officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution for the United States of America, the Republic within which our rights are protected by a service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation?
It appears by their actions that most government employees, knowingly or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the corporate UNITED STATES.
It is our duty as the People who elected them into office, to demand accountability from our "public" officials and confront them as to where their loyalties lie. Is it with the corrupt, treasonous corporation that is controlled by foreign enemies from within and without, or is it with our constitutional Republic, the United States of America and her citizens?
Most of us will I ask, can this be true? Ask yourself: How can this government enact such scams as the unconstitutional and privately-owned Federal Reserve System -- a for-profit corporation, or the unconstitutional income tax system, where there is clearly no proof a law exists which states the average person is required to file a tax return (there have been full page ads in USA Today newspaper paid for and written by former IRS agents detailing this truth)?
How can they send our boys off to fight foreign wars without a declaration of war? How can they administer false prosecutions against people, like Gary Phillips, whose attempt to expose the truth forced him to flee the country he honorably served his entire life?
Now we have Mark Alan of Oroville, Wash., being arrested o n Feb. 8, 200l, for allegedly assaulting a federal officer (The Idaho Observer, March, 2001). The charges are false and witnesses were at the scene to testify as such. Mark Alan has been kidnapped, arrested and imprisoned in Spokane County Jail without bail, and is presently challenging the court's jurisdictional authority based on the previously reported facts. In response to Mark's arguments Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Hopkins who is representing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, said that Mr. Alan's arguments may have been novel in 1800, but in 2001 he has insulated himself from the reality of 200 years of legal history that rejected his arguments-inferring the Constitution is outdated.
He stated a UNITED STATES case that confirmed this in 1997. Mr. Alan responded, asking Mr. Hopkins as to which United States he was referring. Further, Mark very pointedly demanded to see Federal Magistrate Judge Cynthia Imbrogno's oath of office -- which she has never provided -- and went into immediate recess when asked for it in open court.
If the inference is that the Constitution is outdated, then please tell us which part is outdated, Mr. Hopkins. Is it the part that is supposed to prevent excessive bail (8th Amendment)? Is it the part that is supposed to allow us freedom of speech, the press, or religion (1st Amendment)? Is it the part that is supposed to allow us to be secure in our homes (the 4th Amendment)? Or perhaps it's the part that, according to Thomas Jefferson and current Attorney General John Ashcroft, allows us the right to bear arms as a last defense against tyranny in government (the 2nd Amendment)?
By 2001, anyone who challenges the authority of the UNITED STATES with facts of law and history is either forced to flee for fear of their life, demonized in the courts to the point nobody will believe them, are intimidated with threats, falsely imprisoned or just simply murdered.
The media continues this perfidy with outright lies and very artfully contrived distortions of the facts.
If our Founding Fathers were alive today and you were to meet one of them, ask yourself: "What might he think of me? Am I striving to preserve the heritage he gave his life and sacred honor to provide me?
Mark Alan and Gary Phillips have sacrificed everything to protect our heritage. They could stand up with our Founding Fathers...Could YOU?
George Washington once said, "Government is like fire. We bring it into our rooms to keep us warm, but we build a chimney to keep the fire from consuming us. The Constitution is the chimney that keeps government from consuming us."
Has that chimney collapsed? Is it simply in need of restoration? Or is the house already on fire?
The manner in which Phillips, Mark Alan and others have been treated is an indication that our constitutional house is, in fact, on fire.
*****************************
From the March 2001 Idaho Observer:
Open Letter to Magistate Judge Cynthia Imbrogno
Re: The arrest of Mark Alan (Rabenold)
Federal Judge Imbrogno, this is going to be an open letter to you and to the people of WashingtonState.
It has come to my attention that Mark Alan (Rabenold) of OkanoganCounty is now being declared a danger to the community. I just have to ask, declared by whom?
I don't claim to know all of Mark's ideas and can not say they are right or wrong, but I need to let you know what I do know of the man. Last year while having lunch in a local drive-in, Mark came in and sat down next to us. We got into a conversation and I asked him about a rumor I had heard about his past employment as a police officer and was it true, and if true, why did he quit the force. Mark told us about being on the local city police force, and the requirement of going to the WashingtonStatePatrolAcademy to be a commissioned officer, of which he attended.
Mark told us about a class he was attending at the academy where the instructor was (as a standard matter of procedure) instructing the class on how to harass and detain any citizen any time, anywhere, for no reason what ever. In class, Mark said he challenged the instructor about creating a legal issue with a private citizen where none was and that he thought this action by a police officer was totally wrong.
The instructor's response was to bark at him in front of the class with "Do you wanna be a cop, or do you wanna be a lawyer?" Realizing what was going on in law enforcement training, at this point, Mark told us that he responded with "I sure as hell don't want to be your kind of cop" he then stood up, left the class and went home. The very next day, he quit the city police force.
Now I think we had better chew on that for about five minutes or so. Every policeman who is a commissioned officer has been required to be trained by the state to know how to harass people they don't like, or maybe to just to shore up their arrest record they know what to do to achieve a given arrest goal. The main goal in law enforcement seems to be promoting the image of the agency, their own promotions, pad that old retirement. Make the points whenever possible, often regardless of whom gets hurt. Many in law enforcement just call this a "Tool" that is sometimes needed to bring in the bad guys. I'm sorry Judge Imbrogno; I just don't buy it!
The people of OkanoganCounty have no fear of Mark Alan, what they do fear, and with damn good reason, is law enforcement that no longer respects our civil liberties under our state and federal constitutions. They fear that they could be charged with a phony crime and they will be simply wiped out financially as they can not afford a lawyer. As they simply can not trust a court appointed lawyer because these lawyers have only one function, plea bargain or lose for the victim, not to mention the back room star chamber wheelin-an-a-dealing.
The court rules are so twisted and confusing that no man on this planet can stay on top of them. I have to ask what chance does the everyday citizen have in your court or any other court for that matter. You very well know the answer to this question. NONE!
Authorities lie, and or exaggerate all the time. I am 52 years old. Over the years I have seen some authorities make up things to hassle people that they simply just did not like, and it happens all the time, and we all know it.
To show you just how just how much fear people have of this government we have today. Many people of the Okanogan told me "don't you dare write to the judge and newspaper, they will put your name on a list and then you will end up in jail". Well heck Judge, you tell me, am I going on a list? I choose not to live in fear, so here is the letter I was told by many not to send.
We all know what kind of men the U.S. marshall's have on their team -- look what they did to Sammy Weaver, their own Marshal Deagan. They blew off a little boy's arm at the elbow, then shot this little boy in the back, shot one of their own in the back, blamed someone else for their screw ups -- then lied about it in court. Then they cover each other's butts at all costs. Now that's teamwork at the lowest level. Those people along with Vicky Weaver, died at the hands of adrenaline junkies with badges looking for revenge, for what boiled down to nothing more than a failure to buy $200 permit/tax fee from the B.A.T.F.
By the way Judge Imbrogno, could you tell the people of Okanogan County why the U.S. Marshall's Service, about 20 years ago dropped from their oath of office the part about supporting the U.S. Constitution? -- Not that this little detail could be important or anything.
As to the assault with a deadly weapon charge, heck, if two men I don't know came up to my car and demanded I open my door, to get away fast, I too would punch the gas all the way to the floor. If some nut tries to commit suicide by jumping in front of a moving car, well, if he's that stupid, maybe his gene pool (natural selection don't you know) should come to an end. We can not charge a man with assault by using his car when all he was trying to do was to get away from a possible robbery or worse. Mark was only acting in self-defense in trying to get away from possible harm. Anyone, anytime could approach Mark on the street and talk to him, this whole thing smells (the stench is overbearing) of a setup to create a crime with which to jail Mark on a trumped up charge, after all, the authorities are all government-trained experts at doing just that.
Mark Alan is no threat to the community, whoever says otherwise, is lying, or being fooled by a liar. Mark is a family man with six children and a home. He is not going to run away to avoid a valid prosecution, Mark Alan (Rabenold) is a man of his word, unlike, I regret to say, many who are currently employed in law enforcement. At this point I should add, there are many decent people in law enforcement who do a damn fine job and I sure don't want to take away from that, but we all had better look very close to what is going on in our country before it has gone too far to recover.
Terry O'Donnell
Oroville, Washington
******************************
http://proliberty.com/observer/20090610.htm
From the June 2009 Idaho Observer:
Fedgov considers city, county, state governments as "foreign"
Espionage rings critical to successful military occupation
American military history is replete with examples of how U.S. military and political operatives have established "friendly" governments in U.S. or UN-occupied territories. It is expected that the military would develop a field manual to detail the manner in which military objectives may be facilitated by providing aid, comfort and political stability to war-torn populations in foreign countries. What is not expected is that our own military also considers local, city, county and state governments in America as "foreign" governments.
By Don Harkins
(The following article was originally published in the July, 1999 edition of The Idaho Observer).
Army field manual FM 41-10 entitled "Civil Affairs Operations," published January 11, 1993, is a comprehensive document that details how Army Civil Affairs (CA) personnel are to "establish, maintain, influence or exploit relations between military forces and civil authorities and the civilian populace in an AO [area of operations] to facilitate military operations."
FM 41-10 makes no distinction between local American governments and the governments of foreign nations as it exhaustively describes the strategies designed to "support....U.S. national policy" objectives in occupied territory.
The manual’s page one overview plainly states the necessity of CA operations to insure the success of military objectives. "CA operations are actions carried out as an integral part of a military mission. They assure local authority and popular understanding of, and compliance with, measures supporting military operations and consolidation activities to attain U.S. objectives.
"The CA mission is to support the commander’s relationship with civil authorities and civilian populace, promote mission legitimacy, and enhance military effectiveness," states the army manual as further preamble toward stressing the importance of "exploiting" indigent populations and authorities to legitimize and facilitate military objectives.
Chapter 14 of the manual introduces the U.S. Information Agency (USIA) which "can aid CA personnel by developing popular support. It detects and counters hostile attempts to distort and hinder U.S. policies and programs. It supports CA operations through
• Broadcasts on radio and TV
• Personal contacts
• Demonstrations
• Motion pictures
• Book publication and distribution
• Exhibits
• English language instruction."
According to the manual, USIA "helps to achieve U.S. foreign policy objectives by influencing public attitudes..."
FM 41-10 is the army textbook on how CA operatives are to gain the confidence of local authorities in an effort to "legitimize" operations. Legitimacy is accomplished by exploiting the needs of desperate populations of people through public acts of humanitarianism such as donations of food, medicine and shelter. The same local authorities must also be used to develop espionage rings designed to identify dissidents who defy "U.S. objectives."
There is evidence to support claims that CA operations are currently active in the U.S. Last December FBI Special Agent Burdena Pasenelli announced the formation of a 75-man team of federal agents to coordinate a multi-jurisdictional "taskforce" of city, county and state law enforcement agencies in the Northwest to "...find out ahead of time what is planned and to prevent incidents of domestic terrorism."
Pasenelli stated they have termed the taskforce areas of eastern Washington, western Montana and all of Idaho as the FBI’s "Inland Empire" (The Idaho Observer, January, 1999).
CA operations equal national espionage ring
"U.S. law, including the laws of a state, territory, possession, or other political subdivision of the United States, governs the legal aspects of CMO [civil-military operations]. Provisions of a foreign state’s law may impact a CMO," states the overview of Chapter 10. [emphasis added]
The 200-page CA document, which is easy to read and full of charts, graphs and diagrams, is the instruction manual for successful military occupation of "foreign" soil. The manual is broken into 14 chapters which detail such concepts as "CA Intelligence Planning, Civil Administration in FriendlyTerritory, Civil Administration in OccupiedTerritory, Support of Foreign Internal Defense, Support of Unconventional Warfare" and "Support in Combating Terrorism."
Chapter 6, "Intelligence Aspects of CA Operations," explains the intelligence cycle, information sources, collection methods and collection activities. The manual’s list of "intelligence" sources includes, "Biographical data or other informational background material...Documents including passports, visas, vehicle operator licenses, birth or marriage records, or other similar documents."
All over the nation state legislatures are passing laws which create driver licensing and firearms ownership databases and vaccine tracking registries that can be accessed at any time by federal authorities who are inarguably using the information to identify persons who will most likely be non-supportive of U.S. military objectives on American soil. City and county governments routinely provide federal agents access to any information requested of a person or persons living within a non-federal jurisdiction.
It could happen here
Under the subheading "Civil Defense in the United States" in Chapter 10, the applicability of the manual’s CA strategies to military occupation of U.S. soil are revealed. "In the United States, civil defense is a government responsibility at all levels. The federal government provides planning advice and coordinates research, equipment and financial aid. State and local governments determine the allocation of these resources. In the event of an emergency, U.S. forces must be prepared to help civil authorities repair essential facilities and, if necessary, to take such actions as directed to ensure national survival."[emphasis added]
There are several executive orders, particularly EO12919, which, upon a declared state of national emergency, places command and control authority of all national resources and activities under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The manual recognizes FEMA’s 10 regions and U.S military subservience to agency authority in a declared state of national emergency.
Populace and resources control
According to the army, one of the most critical aspects of successful CA operations is the denial of resources to the perceived enemy. "Successful PRC denies the enemy resources and access to the population. It protects the people and denies the insurgent ready access to the populace and both internal and external sources of supply...PRC....can be applied across the operational continuum to protect the legitimate interests of the government," stated the manual in Chapter 1.
If the army is called in to police a conflict, domestic or otherwise, quality PRC would, of course, be critical to a successful military operation. For the army to be utilized in such a capacity that PRC activities would be necessary, certain conditions must be present. In figure 2.1, "Conditions that impact on regional stability," the manual lists 10 conditions that could lead to military presence on American soil:
• Political ideologies that elevate the state or special interest groups above the human rights of citizens.
• International political rivalry.
• Recurring national disasters or man-made destruction resulting from combat or accidents.
• Low per capita income and unemployment
• Disproportionate control of economic resources by an elite group.
• High illiteracy rates and low education levels.
• Atmosphere and water pollution, soil erosion, and crop damage.
• Economic exploitation, actual or imagined, by world powers.
• Illegal drug trade.
• Traditional cultural or religious disputes in a single region or state.
All of the conditions above are currently present in the U.S. There is evidence to suggest that most, if not all of them, are the result of (failed?) government policy and programs. As Americans become disenchanted with their lives while the above mentioned conditions worsen, army CA operatives will continually measure the attitudes of the populace for intelligence purposes. As a populace becomes angry, it may begin to distrust its civilian authority figures and begin to violate laws. The manual lists eight items by which CA personnel may measure the people’s attitudes:
• Lack of cooperation by resistance movements
• Lack of cooperation as shown by violations of laws.
• Evidence of doubt and suspicion or ill-tempered compliance or reluctance to work with CA personnel.
• Comparison or contrast with attitudes in other zones.
• Expressions in public opinion polls.
• Fraternization or other friendly gestures toward occupation force personnel.
• Statements in the press, radio, handbills, rumors, or films.
• Demand for change voiced through clandestine or open meetings.
U.S. military occupation of American soil appears inevitable
Several things are working in concert to indicate the inevitability that the land of the free will soon become the land of the militarily occupied. First let us list the predicted catharses which would bring about military occupation of American soil, a condition commonly referred to as martial law:
Y2K. The global meltdown of the computer age as a result of time running out on date sensitive programs that are unable to accurately calculate dates after December 31, 1999. Government and industry has spent billions of dollars in preparation for Y2K. There are credible people in positions of authority who believe that Y2K could bring about a global financial collapse and a critical interruption in the delivery of essential goods and services. A realization of this scenario would necessitate the declaration of a national state of emergency, the declaration of martial law and a more overt implementation of strategies outlined in FM 41-10.
Influenza Pandemic. On February 25, 1999, the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) broadcast a program to all of the nation’s public health officials which stated that an influenza pandemic is inevitable, that it will likely occur very soon and that 400,000 Americans may die as a result. "Preparing for the Next Influenza Pandemic," describes how important it will be for public health officials to be prepared for the pandemic. The CDC described how President Ford commissioned preparation of the Federal Guidebook to Pandemic Preparedness in the wake of the swine flu outbreak of 1976. The CDC indicated that what must be a very comprehensive manual is not yet complete but that draft copies are available. If 400,000 Americans are going to die as the CDC predicts, there will be a declaration of a national state of emergency. At that time the strategies outlined in FM 41-10 will go into effect coupled with the strategies outlined in the Federal Guidebook of Pandemic Preparedness which, among other things, describes how local officials will treat the predicted 50 million sick people and vaccinate every American.
Aside from the Federal Guidebook to Pandemic Preparedness, recent past presidents have signed executive orders that place under federal control every public and private aspect of American life (for starters, look up the following executive orders: 10995, 10997, 10998, 11000, 11001, 11002, 11003, 11004, 11005, 11051, 12148 and 12919) in the event of a declared state of national emergency.
Local governments all over the country have responded by adopting emergency powers ordinances that, when put into effect, give unelected city managers (or city administrators) the power to control every aspect of community life and to coordinate their efforts through federal authorities such as FEMA and CA operatives (a copy of the model ordinance was published in the April, 1999 edition of The Idaho Observer).
People all over America may be aware that the federal government has been planning and preparing to seize dictatorial control of this nation and all of its activities in a declared state of emergency but may not believe that an emergency will be manufactured. Regardless, a prudent person who believes in freedom should understand the need to prepare himself and his family in a manner most likely to preserve their freedom in the event that plans to take it away will someday soon be federally enforced at gunpoint.
******************************
http://proliberty.com/observer/20090730.htm
From the July 2009 Idaho Observer:
What you can do to protect yourself and your family from the likelihood of forced vaccination with an experimental (and possibly deadly) pandemic flu vaccine
Historically, the only effective means of protecting yourself from government tyranny is to awaken a majority of people in your community and state to the facts at hand and encourage their participation in the education of those around them as if their life depends upon it—because it does. At the same time, it is important to present the information you have amassed on the topic from both government and mainstream sources in a calm, rational manner. This is not to say that the topic of forced vaccination for the "greater good" isn’t an emotional issue since it most definitely is. But if we engage others on a level of emotion that brings up foundational beliefs where reason and facts are ignored, we will fail in our mission to awaken the people around us to the gravity of the situation we are facing. With this is mind, these are the steps we are taking to protect ourselves, our families, our communities and state from the federal government and WHO’s plans to initiate mass vaccination of the populace this fall. It is important to remember that the glitch in their plans will be when local public awareness is raised to a level where the administrators will not be able or willing to administrate the WHO/CDC plans.
• Work locally with existing groups where you or someone you know maintains membership—churches, Bible studies, homeschoolers and political/environmental/neighborhood watches. Ask for 10 minutes of their time at the next meeting to present a brief overview of what the Obama administration and HHS Secretary Sebelius have been busy doing since the WHO announcement of a Level 6 pandemic. Go to medicalcountermeasures.gov and HHS.gov for details to support your information. Download flyers and other pertinent information at PandemicFluOnline.com After your talk, ask if you can get their help for a grassroots public education campaign. Hopefully, you will receive willing participation from those attending.
• Contact the Chamber of Commerce and get a list of service organizations and other active groups in your county. Call them up and ask when their next meeting is. Ask the group chairperson if you can have five to ten minutes to speak at their next meeting on swine flu pandemic preparedness. Make a list of groups, meeting times and dates.
• Go to PandemicFluOnline.com for a sample short talk you can use for these meetings. You do not need to have a Powerpoint Presentation for this short talk but there is one available if you need one and are given more time to present this critical information.
• Write letters to the editor for your local newspaper. Make sure that several people are willing to do this so there is a choir of people speaking out against the swine flu vaccination in production. Develop your own and share it with PandemicFluOnline.com or access sample letters to use there.
• Call into talk radio stations and bring up the Nuremberg trials where 4 out of 11 counts involved the experimental use of toxic inoculations without informed consent. See "The Nuremberg Code: It’s historical and contemporary significance" in the May 2002 edition of The Idaho Observer. Encourage listeners to go to PandemicFluOnline.com
• Create your own flyer or download flyers and other information for mass duplication and dissemination. Keep them in your car, share them with people you strike up conversations with and post them on bulletin boards around town. Do NOT put in mailboxes or on windshields of cars. Instead, leave a copy or copies in waiting rooms, banks, post office counters, dentists’ and doctors’ offices, etc.
• Pandemic Flu Awareness Week is August 16 – 22. This is the main week for intense grassroots activism on the issue of mandated vaccination with an experimental swine flu vaccine. To be a part of this growing nationwide movement, call The Idaho Observer or Vaccination Liberation at (208) 255-2307.
From the April 2001 Idaho Observer:
Is our Constitutional House on Fire?
The imprisonment of Oroville, Wash., pro-American microbroadcaster Mark Alan has sold a lot of newspapers in the remote and sparsely populated high country near the Canadian border. A majority of people in the distribution range of The Okanogan Valley Gazette Tribune are angry that the federal government would keep one of their own in jail on bogus assault charges. The tragedy softened the editorial heart of the Tribune into accepting a few articles intended to open a few eyes to some historic truths that explain what is happening to our country. Following is one such article. Thanks, Bob. You have managed to explain a complex concept in terms we can all understand well enough to finally see how we have been had.
by Bob Nicholson
The "Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," Section 34 of the Forty-First Congress of the United States, Session III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 1871, states that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia and to whatever properties are legally titled to the UNITED STATES, by its registration in the corporate County, State, and Federal governments that are under military power of the UNITED STATES and its creditors. Under this provision, the military Congress of the UNITED STATES has the power to pass private international law for application within the federal District of Columbia.
The Act provides that the UNITED STATES, the corporation, has jurisdiction only within the confines of the ten-mile-square parcel of land, known as the District of Columbia, and its legal property; and that the corporation Congress has power to pass Private International Law, applicable only in the District of Columbia.
The Act specifically defines the jurisdiction and the venue of the corporation.
UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation.
What was not said in 1871, but was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(3): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation.
Title 28, UNITED STATES CODE, is Copyrighted Private International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety, is Copyrighted Private International Law, and applicable only in the District of Columbia.
The previous information was taken almost verbatim from the beginning of a letter sent to King County Sheriff David Reichert of Seattle from Gary W. Phillips. Phillips, 69, whose career with the Immigration and Naturalization Service began in 1956 and resulted in his being the federal agency's director at Sea Tac Airport for 20 years, began challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Observer, March, 2000). After nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to flee his country to protect his life after exposing the facts of the illegality of the federal government's criminal income tax collection scam -- facts that are becoming well know among informed people throughout the country.
Why did the Congress feel the need to separate the District of Columbia with a special Act of Congress? What kind of a government did it create? The Congress created a corporation. Where did the Congress find the authority in the Constitution to reconstitute any part of the United States as a corporation? Quite simply, in 1791 the Constitution was set aside to make room for the corporation. Would this Act benefit the Republic? In truth, it would be of no benefit. The corporate bottom line is profit. The municipal bottom line is service. To replace our service-oriented form of government with a profit-oriented form of government without our knowledge or consent can only be described as treason.
The process began in the mid 1860s after the Civil War -- a war that depleted the country financially. Once the smoke settled European international bankers arrived in town. The international bankers and the Congress conjured up this bit of mischief and passed it into law.
But whose law? This Congress broke faith with the People in 1871 and sold us out when they formed this corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia.
A few superficial changes were made to the original Constitution and it was no longer the real thing. Congress did not change the name of the document, so they could claim to be reading from the Constitution. They merely changed it from the Constitution for the United States of America to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They changed the "for" to "of' and capitalized all the letters. All of the sudden we had two Constitutions.
The Act of 1871 provided a government for the District of Columbia and created a corporation entitled the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whose jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities created by the municipal corporation and operative only in the District of Columbia. Washington, District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed within the District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia and it's possessions.
The States of the Republic are not possessions of the District of Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam are possessions of the District of Columbia as well as property legally titled to the UNITED STATES by states and counties.
The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was put together in the District of Columbia as Copyrighted Private International Law and is applicable only in the District of Columbia. By their own rules of jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS have no business prosecuting anyone outside of the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT has no venue outside of the District of Columbia and, therefore, has no jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia and its possessions. The Congress cannot pass a law that is applicable in the several States of the Republic.
If all the laws passed in the District of Columbia are Private International Law, this includes all of the UNITED STATES CODE and the statutes at large passed after 1871, and are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then why have they become the law of the land?
Essentially, this unholy alliance, from its treacherous inception in an international banker-influenced post-Civil War era, built an illegal corporation that has systematically corrupted every state, county and city in this nation and corrupted the thinking of most people of the United States of America.
This illegal corporation has created dozens of agencies, the IRS, FBI, DEA, and the BATF, to name a few, which employ thousands of agents who receive excellent salaries and benefits for betraying their friends and families while enforcing the malefic edicts of the so-called Congress.
The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then release their ill-begotten creatures to destroy those who do not fully conform to their wishes, and strike fear into hearts of those who do.
Kidnapping and conspiracy are involved in every arrest and conviction by federal authorities outside of the District of Columbia.
The question now leads to whether our duly elected public officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution for the United States of America, the Republic within which our rights are protected by a service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation?
It appears by their actions that most government employees, knowingly or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the corporate UNITED STATES.
It is our duty as the People who elected them into office, to demand accountability from our "public" officials and confront them as to where their loyalties lie. Is it with the corrupt, treasonous corporation that is controlled by foreign enemies from within and without, or is it with our constitutional Republic, the United States of America and her citizens?
Most of us will I ask, can this be true? Ask yourself: How can this government enact such scams as the unconstitutional and privately-owned Federal Reserve System -- a for-profit corporation, or the unconstitutional income tax system, where there is clearly no proof a law exists which states the average person is required to file a tax return (there have been full page ads in USA Today newspaper paid for and written by former IRS agents detailing this truth)?
How can they send our boys off to fight foreign wars without a declaration of war? How can they administer false prosecutions against people, like Gary Phillips, whose attempt to expose the truth forced him to flee the country he honorably served his entire life?
Now we have Mark Alan of Oroville, Wash., being arrested o n Feb. 8, 200l, for allegedly assaulting a federal officer (The Idaho Observer, March, 2001). The charges are false and witnesses were at the scene to testify as such. Mark Alan has been kidnapped, arrested and imprisoned in Spokane County Jail without bail, and is presently challenging the court's jurisdictional authority based on the previously reported facts. In response to Mark's arguments Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Hopkins who is representing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, said that Mr. Alan's arguments may have been novel in 1800, but in 2001 he has insulated himself from the reality of 200 years of legal history that rejected his arguments-inferring the Constitution is outdated.
He stated a UNITED STATES case that confirmed this in 1997. Mr. Alan responded, asking Mr. Hopkins as to which United States he was referring. Further, Mark very pointedly demanded to see Federal Magistrate Judge Cynthia Imbrogno's oath of office -- which she has never provided -- and went into immediate recess when asked for it in open court.
If the inference is that the Constitution is outdated, then please tell us which part is outdated, Mr. Hopkins. Is it the part that is supposed to prevent excessive bail (8th Amendment)? Is it the part that is supposed to allow us freedom of speech, the press, or religion (1st Amendment)? Is it the part that is supposed to allow us to be secure in our homes (the 4th Amendment)? Or perhaps it's the part that, according to Thomas Jefferson and current Attorney General John Ashcroft, allows us the right to bear arms as a last defense against tyranny in government (the 2nd Amendment)?
By 2001, anyone who challenges the authority of the UNITED STATES with facts of law and history is either forced to flee for fear of their life, demonized in the courts to the point nobody will believe them, are intimidated with threats, falsely imprisoned or just simply murdered.
The media continues this perfidy with outright lies and very artfully contrived distortions of the facts.
If our Founding Fathers were alive today and you were to meet one of them, ask yourself: "What might he think of me? Am I striving to preserve the heritage he gave his life and sacred honor to provide me?
Mark Alan and Gary Phillips have sacrificed everything to protect our heritage. They could stand up with our Founding Fathers...Could YOU?
George Washington once said, "Government is like fire. We bring it into our rooms to keep us warm, but we build a chimney to keep the fire from consuming us. The Constitution is the chimney that keeps government from consuming us."
Has that chimney collapsed? Is it simply in need of restoration? Or is the house already on fire?
The manner in which Phillips, Mark Alan and others have been treated is an indication that our constitutional house is, in fact, on fire.
*****************************
From the March 2001 Idaho Observer:
Open Letter to Magistate Judge Cynthia Imbrogno
Re: The arrest of Mark Alan (Rabenold)
Federal Judge Imbrogno, this is going to be an open letter to you and to the people of WashingtonState.
It has come to my attention that Mark Alan (Rabenold) of OkanoganCounty is now being declared a danger to the community. I just have to ask, declared by whom?
I don't claim to know all of Mark's ideas and can not say they are right or wrong, but I need to let you know what I do know of the man. Last year while having lunch in a local drive-in, Mark came in and sat down next to us. We got into a conversation and I asked him about a rumor I had heard about his past employment as a police officer and was it true, and if true, why did he quit the force. Mark told us about being on the local city police force, and the requirement of going to the WashingtonStatePatrolAcademy to be a commissioned officer, of which he attended.
Mark told us about a class he was attending at the academy where the instructor was (as a standard matter of procedure) instructing the class on how to harass and detain any citizen any time, anywhere, for no reason what ever. In class, Mark said he challenged the instructor about creating a legal issue with a private citizen where none was and that he thought this action by a police officer was totally wrong.
The instructor's response was to bark at him in front of the class with "Do you wanna be a cop, or do you wanna be a lawyer?" Realizing what was going on in law enforcement training, at this point, Mark told us that he responded with "I sure as hell don't want to be your kind of cop" he then stood up, left the class and went home. The very next day, he quit the city police force.
Now I think we had better chew on that for about five minutes or so. Every policeman who is a commissioned officer has been required to be trained by the state to know how to harass people they don't like, or maybe to just to shore up their arrest record they know what to do to achieve a given arrest goal. The main goal in law enforcement seems to be promoting the image of the agency, their own promotions, pad that old retirement. Make the points whenever possible, often regardless of whom gets hurt. Many in law enforcement just call this a "Tool" that is sometimes needed to bring in the bad guys. I'm sorry Judge Imbrogno; I just don't buy it!
The people of OkanoganCounty have no fear of Mark Alan, what they do fear, and with damn good reason, is law enforcement that no longer respects our civil liberties under our state and federal constitutions. They fear that they could be charged with a phony crime and they will be simply wiped out financially as they can not afford a lawyer. As they simply can not trust a court appointed lawyer because these lawyers have only one function, plea bargain or lose for the victim, not to mention the back room star chamber wheelin-an-a-dealing.
The court rules are so twisted and confusing that no man on this planet can stay on top of them. I have to ask what chance does the everyday citizen have in your court or any other court for that matter. You very well know the answer to this question. NONE!
Authorities lie, and or exaggerate all the time. I am 52 years old. Over the years I have seen some authorities make up things to hassle people that they simply just did not like, and it happens all the time, and we all know it.
To show you just how just how much fear people have of this government we have today. Many people of the Okanogan told me "don't you dare write to the judge and newspaper, they will put your name on a list and then you will end up in jail". Well heck Judge, you tell me, am I going on a list? I choose not to live in fear, so here is the letter I was told by many not to send.
We all know what kind of men the U.S. marshall's have on their team -- look what they did to Sammy Weaver, their own Marshal Deagan. They blew off a little boy's arm at the elbow, then shot this little boy in the back, shot one of their own in the back, blamed someone else for their screw ups -- then lied about it in court. Then they cover each other's butts at all costs. Now that's teamwork at the lowest level. Those people along with Vicky Weaver, died at the hands of adrenaline junkies with badges looking for revenge, for what boiled down to nothing more than a failure to buy $200 permit/tax fee from the B.A.T.F.
By the way Judge Imbrogno, could you tell the people of Okanogan County why the U.S. Marshall's Service, about 20 years ago dropped from their oath of office the part about supporting the U.S. Constitution? -- Not that this little detail could be important or anything.
As to the assault with a deadly weapon charge, heck, if two men I don't know came up to my car and demanded I open my door, to get away fast, I too would punch the gas all the way to the floor. If some nut tries to commit suicide by jumping in front of a moving car, well, if he's that stupid, maybe his gene pool (natural selection don't you know) should come to an end. We can not charge a man with assault by using his car when all he was trying to do was to get away from a possible robbery or worse. Mark was only acting in self-defense in trying to get away from possible harm. Anyone, anytime could approach Mark on the street and talk to him, this whole thing smells (the stench is overbearing) of a setup to create a crime with which to jail Mark on a trumped up charge, after all, the authorities are all government-trained experts at doing just that.
Mark Alan is no threat to the community, whoever says otherwise, is lying, or being fooled by a liar. Mark is a family man with six children and a home. He is not going to run away to avoid a valid prosecution, Mark Alan (Rabenold) is a man of his word, unlike, I regret to say, many who are currently employed in law enforcement. At this point I should add, there are many decent people in law enforcement who do a damn fine job and I sure don't want to take away from that, but we all had better look very close to what is going on in our country before it has gone too far to recover.
Terry O'Donnell
Oroville, Washington
******************************
http://proliberty.com/observer/20090610.htm
From the June 2009 Idaho Observer:
Fedgov considers city, county, state governments as "foreign"
Espionage rings critical to successful military occupation
American military history is replete with examples of how U.S. military and political operatives have established "friendly" governments in U.S. or UN-occupied territories. It is expected that the military would develop a field manual to detail the manner in which military objectives may be facilitated by providing aid, comfort and political stability to war-torn populations in foreign countries. What is not expected is that our own military also considers local, city, county and state governments in America as "foreign" governments.
By Don Harkins
(The following article was originally published in the July, 1999 edition of The Idaho Observer).
Army field manual FM 41-10 entitled "Civil Affairs Operations," published January 11, 1993, is a comprehensive document that details how Army Civil Affairs (CA) personnel are to "establish, maintain, influence or exploit relations between military forces and civil authorities and the civilian populace in an AO [area of operations] to facilitate military operations."
FM 41-10 makes no distinction between local American governments and the governments of foreign nations as it exhaustively describes the strategies designed to "support....U.S. national policy" objectives in occupied territory.
The manual’s page one overview plainly states the necessity of CA operations to insure the success of military objectives. "CA operations are actions carried out as an integral part of a military mission. They assure local authority and popular understanding of, and compliance with, measures supporting military operations and consolidation activities to attain U.S. objectives.
"The CA mission is to support the commander’s relationship with civil authorities and civilian populace, promote mission legitimacy, and enhance military effectiveness," states the army manual as further preamble toward stressing the importance of "exploiting" indigent populations and authorities to legitimize and facilitate military objectives.
Chapter 14 of the manual introduces the U.S. Information Agency (USIA) which "can aid CA personnel by developing popular support. It detects and counters hostile attempts to distort and hinder U.S. policies and programs. It supports CA operations through
• Broadcasts on radio and TV
• Personal contacts
• Demonstrations
• Motion pictures
• Book publication and distribution
• Exhibits
• English language instruction."
According to the manual, USIA "helps to achieve U.S. foreign policy objectives by influencing public attitudes..."
FM 41-10 is the army textbook on how CA operatives are to gain the confidence of local authorities in an effort to "legitimize" operations. Legitimacy is accomplished by exploiting the needs of desperate populations of people through public acts of humanitarianism such as donations of food, medicine and shelter. The same local authorities must also be used to develop espionage rings designed to identify dissidents who defy "U.S. objectives."
There is evidence to support claims that CA operations are currently active in the U.S. Last December FBI Special Agent Burdena Pasenelli announced the formation of a 75-man team of federal agents to coordinate a multi-jurisdictional "taskforce" of city, county and state law enforcement agencies in the Northwest to "...find out ahead of time what is planned and to prevent incidents of domestic terrorism."
Pasenelli stated they have termed the taskforce areas of eastern Washington, western Montana and all of Idaho as the FBI’s "Inland Empire" (The Idaho Observer, January, 1999).
CA operations equal national espionage ring
"U.S. law, including the laws of a state, territory, possession, or other political subdivision of the United States, governs the legal aspects of CMO [civil-military operations]. Provisions of a foreign state’s law may impact a CMO," states the overview of Chapter 10. [emphasis added]
The 200-page CA document, which is easy to read and full of charts, graphs and diagrams, is the instruction manual for successful military occupation of "foreign" soil. The manual is broken into 14 chapters which detail such concepts as "CA Intelligence Planning, Civil Administration in FriendlyTerritory, Civil Administration in OccupiedTerritory, Support of Foreign Internal Defense, Support of Unconventional Warfare" and "Support in Combating Terrorism."
Chapter 6, "Intelligence Aspects of CA Operations," explains the intelligence cycle, information sources, collection methods and collection activities. The manual’s list of "intelligence" sources includes, "Biographical data or other informational background material...Documents including passports, visas, vehicle operator licenses, birth or marriage records, or other similar documents."
All over the nation state legislatures are passing laws which create driver licensing and firearms ownership databases and vaccine tracking registries that can be accessed at any time by federal authorities who are inarguably using the information to identify persons who will most likely be non-supportive of U.S. military objectives on American soil. City and county governments routinely provide federal agents access to any information requested of a person or persons living within a non-federal jurisdiction.
It could happen here
Under the subheading "Civil Defense in the United States" in Chapter 10, the applicability of the manual’s CA strategies to military occupation of U.S. soil are revealed. "In the United States, civil defense is a government responsibility at all levels. The federal government provides planning advice and coordinates research, equipment and financial aid. State and local governments determine the allocation of these resources. In the event of an emergency, U.S. forces must be prepared to help civil authorities repair essential facilities and, if necessary, to take such actions as directed to ensure national survival."[emphasis added]
There are several executive orders, particularly EO12919, which, upon a declared state of national emergency, places command and control authority of all national resources and activities under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The manual recognizes FEMA’s 10 regions and U.S military subservience to agency authority in a declared state of national emergency.
Populace and resources control
According to the army, one of the most critical aspects of successful CA operations is the denial of resources to the perceived enemy. "Successful PRC denies the enemy resources and access to the population. It protects the people and denies the insurgent ready access to the populace and both internal and external sources of supply...PRC....can be applied across the operational continuum to protect the legitimate interests of the government," stated the manual in Chapter 1.
If the army is called in to police a conflict, domestic or otherwise, quality PRC would, of course, be critical to a successful military operation. For the army to be utilized in such a capacity that PRC activities would be necessary, certain conditions must be present. In figure 2.1, "Conditions that impact on regional stability," the manual lists 10 conditions that could lead to military presence on American soil:
• Political ideologies that elevate the state or special interest groups above the human rights of citizens.
• International political rivalry.
• Recurring national disasters or man-made destruction resulting from combat or accidents.
• Low per capita income and unemployment
• Disproportionate control of economic resources by an elite group.
• High illiteracy rates and low education levels.
• Atmosphere and water pollution, soil erosion, and crop damage.
• Economic exploitation, actual or imagined, by world powers.
• Illegal drug trade.
• Traditional cultural or religious disputes in a single region or state.
All of the conditions above are currently present in the U.S. There is evidence to suggest that most, if not all of them, are the result of (failed?) government policy and programs. As Americans become disenchanted with their lives while the above mentioned conditions worsen, army CA operatives will continually measure the attitudes of the populace for intelligence purposes. As a populace becomes angry, it may begin to distrust its civilian authority figures and begin to violate laws. The manual lists eight items by which CA personnel may measure the people’s attitudes:
• Lack of cooperation by resistance movements
• Lack of cooperation as shown by violations of laws.
• Evidence of doubt and suspicion or ill-tempered compliance or reluctance to work with CA personnel.
• Comparison or contrast with attitudes in other zones.
• Expressions in public opinion polls.
• Fraternization or other friendly gestures toward occupation force personnel.
• Statements in the press, radio, handbills, rumors, or films.
• Demand for change voiced through clandestine or open meetings.
U.S. military occupation of American soil appears inevitable
Several things are working in concert to indicate the inevitability that the land of the free will soon become the land of the militarily occupied. First let us list the predicted catharses which would bring about military occupation of American soil, a condition commonly referred to as martial law:
Y2K. The global meltdown of the computer age as a result of time running out on date sensitive programs that are unable to accurately calculate dates after December 31, 1999. Government and industry has spent billions of dollars in preparation for Y2K. There are credible people in positions of authority who believe that Y2K could bring about a global financial collapse and a critical interruption in the delivery of essential goods and services. A realization of this scenario would necessitate the declaration of a national state of emergency, the declaration of martial law and a more overt implementation of strategies outlined in FM 41-10.
Influenza Pandemic. On February 25, 1999, the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) broadcast a program to all of the nation’s public health officials which stated that an influenza pandemic is inevitable, that it will likely occur very soon and that 400,000 Americans may die as a result. "Preparing for the Next Influenza Pandemic," describes how important it will be for public health officials to be prepared for the pandemic. The CDC described how President Ford commissioned preparation of the Federal Guidebook to Pandemic Preparedness in the wake of the swine flu outbreak of 1976. The CDC indicated that what must be a very comprehensive manual is not yet complete but that draft copies are available. If 400,000 Americans are going to die as the CDC predicts, there will be a declaration of a national state of emergency. At that time the strategies outlined in FM 41-10 will go into effect coupled with the strategies outlined in the Federal Guidebook of Pandemic Preparedness which, among other things, describes how local officials will treat the predicted 50 million sick people and vaccinate every American.
Aside from the Federal Guidebook to Pandemic Preparedness, recent past presidents have signed executive orders that place under federal control every public and private aspect of American life (for starters, look up the following executive orders: 10995, 10997, 10998, 11000, 11001, 11002, 11003, 11004, 11005, 11051, 12148 and 12919) in the event of a declared state of national emergency.
Local governments all over the country have responded by adopting emergency powers ordinances that, when put into effect, give unelected city managers (or city administrators) the power to control every aspect of community life and to coordinate their efforts through federal authorities such as FEMA and CA operatives (a copy of the model ordinance was published in the April, 1999 edition of The Idaho Observer).
People all over America may be aware that the federal government has been planning and preparing to seize dictatorial control of this nation and all of its activities in a declared state of emergency but may not believe that an emergency will be manufactured. Regardless, a prudent person who believes in freedom should understand the need to prepare himself and his family in a manner most likely to preserve their freedom in the event that plans to take it away will someday soon be federally enforced at gunpoint.
******************************
http://proliberty.com/observer/20090730.htm
From the July 2009 Idaho Observer:
What you can do to protect yourself and your family from the likelihood of forced vaccination with an experimental (and possibly deadly) pandemic flu vaccine
Historically, the only effective means of protecting yourself from government tyranny is to awaken a majority of people in your community and state to the facts at hand and encourage their participation in the education of those around them as if their life depends upon it—because it does. At the same time, it is important to present the information you have amassed on the topic from both government and mainstream sources in a calm, rational manner. This is not to say that the topic of forced vaccination for the "greater good" isn’t an emotional issue since it most definitely is. But if we engage others on a level of emotion that brings up foundational beliefs where reason and facts are ignored, we will fail in our mission to awaken the people around us to the gravity of the situation we are facing. With this is mind, these are the steps we are taking to protect ourselves, our families, our communities and state from the federal government and WHO’s plans to initiate mass vaccination of the populace this fall. It is important to remember that the glitch in their plans will be when local public awareness is raised to a level where the administrators will not be able or willing to administrate the WHO/CDC plans.
• Work locally with existing groups where you or someone you know maintains membership—churches, Bible studies, homeschoolers and political/environmental/neighborhood watches. Ask for 10 minutes of their time at the next meeting to present a brief overview of what the Obama administration and HHS Secretary Sebelius have been busy doing since the WHO announcement of a Level 6 pandemic. Go to medicalcountermeasures.gov and HHS.gov for details to support your information. Download flyers and other pertinent information at PandemicFluOnline.com After your talk, ask if you can get their help for a grassroots public education campaign. Hopefully, you will receive willing participation from those attending.
• Contact the Chamber of Commerce and get a list of service organizations and other active groups in your county. Call them up and ask when their next meeting is. Ask the group chairperson if you can have five to ten minutes to speak at their next meeting on swine flu pandemic preparedness. Make a list of groups, meeting times and dates.
• Go to PandemicFluOnline.com for a sample short talk you can use for these meetings. You do not need to have a Powerpoint Presentation for this short talk but there is one available if you need one and are given more time to present this critical information.
• Write letters to the editor for your local newspaper. Make sure that several people are willing to do this so there is a choir of people speaking out against the swine flu vaccination in production. Develop your own and share it with PandemicFluOnline.com or access sample letters to use there.
• Call into talk radio stations and bring up the Nuremberg trials where 4 out of 11 counts involved the experimental use of toxic inoculations without informed consent. See "The Nuremberg Code: It’s historical and contemporary significance" in the May 2002 edition of The Idaho Observer. Encourage listeners to go to PandemicFluOnline.com
• Create your own flyer or download flyers and other information for mass duplication and dissemination. Keep them in your car, share them with people you strike up conversations with and post them on bulletin boards around town. Do NOT put in mailboxes or on windshields of cars. Instead, leave a copy or copies in waiting rooms, banks, post office counters, dentists’ and doctors’ offices, etc.
• Pandemic Flu Awareness Week is August 16 – 22. This is the main week for intense grassroots activism on the issue of mandated vaccination with an experimental swine flu vaccine. To be a part of this growing nationwide movement, call The Idaho Observer or Vaccination Liberation at (208) 255-2307.
